| Title |
The Western Denmark Cardiac Computed Tomography Registry: a review and validation study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/clep.s73728 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lene Hüche Nielsen, Bjarne Linde Nørgaard, Hans Henrik Tilsted, Niels Peter Sand, Jesper Møller Jensen, Morten Bøttcher, Axel C Diederichsen, Jess Lambrechtsen, Lone Deibjerg Kristensen, Hans Mickley, Henrik Munkholm, Ole Gøtzsche, Lars Lyhne Knudsen, Hans Erik Bøtker, Lars Pedersen, Morten Schmidt |
| Abstract |
As a subregistry to the Western Denmark Heart Registry (WDHR), the Western Denmark Cardiac Computed Tomography Registry (WDHR-CCTR) is a clinical database established in 2008 to monitor and improve the quality of cardiac computed tomography (CT) in Western Denmark. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 39 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 65% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2023.
All research outputs
#19,645,031
of 25,013,458 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#592
of 779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,058
of 373,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,013,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.