↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Maintenance inhaler preference, attribute importance, and satisfaction in prescribing physicians and patients with asthma, COPD, or asthma–COPD overlap syndrome consulting for routine care

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Maintenance inhaler preference, attribute importance, and satisfaction in prescribing physicians and patients with asthma, COPD, or asthma–COPD overlap syndrome consulting for routine care
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, March 2018
DOI 10.2147/copd.s154525
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bo Ding, Mark Small, Gina Scheffel, Ulf Holmgren

Abstract

In respiratory disorders, patient- and physician-perceived satisfaction with the maintenance inhaler device is an important factor driving treatment compliance and outcomes. We examine inhaler preferences in asthma and COPD from patient and physician perspectives, particularly focusing on the relative importance of individual device attributes and patient characteristics guiding inhaler choice. Real-world data from >7,300 patients with asthma, COPD, or asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) consulting for routine care were derived from respiratory Disease Specific Programs conducted in Europe, USA, Japan, and China. Outcome variables included current pattern of inhaled maintenance therapy and device type, physician preference, patient-reported device attribute importance, and satisfaction. The most commonly prescribed inhalers for maintenance therapy of asthma, COPD, and ACOS were dry powder inhalers (62.8%-88.5% of patients) and pressurized metered dose inhalers (18.9%-35.3% of patients). One-third of physicians stated no preference for maintenance device when prescribing treatment, and less than one-third of patients reported being "extremely satisfied" with any attribute of their device. Instructions being "simple and easy to follow" was the inhaler attribute most commonly selected as important. For approximately one-third of patients across all groups, "ease of use/suitability of inhaler device" was a reason for the prescribing decision, as stated by the physician. Device characteristics were more likely to impact the prescribing decision in older patients (in asthma and COPD;P<0.01) and those with worse disease severity (in COPD;P<0.001). A relatively high proportion of physicians had no preference for inhaler type across asthma, COPD, and ACOS. Simplicity of use was the most important inhaler attribute from a patient's perspective. Physicians appeared to place most importance on ease of use and device suitability when selecting inhalers for older patients and those with more severe disease, particularly in COPD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 13%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 26 24%
Unknown 32 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 8%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 38 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#6,574,797
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#732
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,062
of 344,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#28
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.