↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit in throwing athletes: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
Title
Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit in throwing athletes: current perspectives
Published in
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, March 2018
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s138975
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael B Rose, Thomas Noonan

Abstract

Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) is an adaptive process in which the throwing shoulder experiences a loss of internal rotation (IR). GIRD has most commonly been defined by a loss of >20° of IR compared to the contralateral shoulder. Total rotational motion of the shoulder is the sum of internal and external rotation and may be more important than the absolute value of IR loss. Pathologic GIRD has been defined as a loss of IR combined with a loss of total rotational motion. The leading pathologic process in GIRD is posterior capsular and rotator-cuff tightness, due to the repetitive cocking that occurs with the overhead throwing motion. GIRD has been associated with numerous pathologic conditions, including posterior superior labral tears, partial articular-sided rotator-cuff tears, and superior labral anterior-to-posterior tears. The mainstay of treatment for patients with GIRD is posterior capsular stretching and strengthening to improve scapular mechanics. In patients who fail nonoperative therapy, shoulder arthroscopy can be performed. Arthroscopic surgery in the high-level throwing athlete should be to restore them to their functional baseline with the minimum amount of intervention possible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 258 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 19%
Student > Master 43 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 82 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 19%
Sports and Recreations 39 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 88 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,871,772
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#117
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,938
of 331,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.