↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Oncolytic virotherapy in upper gastrointestinal tract cancers

Overview of attention for article published in Oncolytic Virotherapy, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Oncolytic virotherapy in upper gastrointestinal tract cancers
Published in
Oncolytic Virotherapy, March 2018
DOI 10.2147/ov.s161397
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raquel Yokoda, Bolni M Nagalo, Mansi Arora, Jan B Egan, James M Bogenberger, Thomas T DeLeon, Yumei Zhou, Daniel H Ahn, Mitesh J Borad

Abstract

Upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies are among the most challenging cancers with regard to response to treatment and prognosis. Cancers of the esophagus, stomach, pancreas, liver, and biliary tree have dismal 5-year survival, and very modest improvements in this rate have been made in recent times. Oncolytic viruses are being developed to address these malignancies, with a focus on high safety profiles and low off-target toxicities. Each viral platform has evolved to enhance oncolytic potency and the clinical response to either single-agent viral therapy or combined viral treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. A panel of genomic alterations, chimeric proteins, and pseudotyped capsids are the breakthroughs for vector success. This article revisits developments for each viral platform to each tumor type, in an attempt to achieve maximum tumor selectivity. From the bench to clinical trials, the scope of this review is to highlight the beginnings of translational oncolytic virotherapy research in upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies and provide a bioengineering perspective of the most promising platforms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Other 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 14%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,175,543
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Oncolytic Virotherapy
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,226
of 348,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncolytic Virotherapy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them