↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Effects of relative negative spherical aberration in single vision contact lens visual performance

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Optometry, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 108)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Effects of relative negative spherical aberration in single vision contact lens visual performance
Published in
Clinical Optometry, January 2018
DOI 10.2147/opto.s142952
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danny Kho, Cathleen Fedtke, Daniel Tilia, Jennie Diec, Jennifer Sha, Varghese Thomas, Ravi C Bakaraju

Abstract

The study aimed to compare the visual performance of contact lenses with and without negative spherical aberration (SA) over 5 days of wear. At baseline, 32 myopic participants (aged 18-33 years) were fitted in a randomized order with two lenses (test lens with minimal or no SA and 1-Day Acuvue Moist designed with negative SA) for 5 days (minimum 6 hours wear/day). Participants returned for a follow-up visit. This consisted of on-axis SA measurements; high- and low-contrast visual acuities at 6 m; high-contrast acuities at 70 and 40 cm; low-illumination, low-contrast acuity at 6 m; stereopsis at 40 cm; horizontal phorias at 3 m and 33 cm; and ±2.00 D monocular accommodative facility at 33 cm. Participants also rated (1-10 scale) vision quality (clarity and lack of ghosting for distance, intermediate, near, driving vision and vision stability during day- and night-time), overall vision satisfaction, ocular comfort, and willingness to purchase (yes/no response). 1-Day Acuvue Moist induced significantly (p<0.05) more negative SA at distance (Δ=0.078 μm) and near (Δ=0.064 μm) compared to the test lens, for a 6 mm pupil. There were no significant differences (p>0.05) in acuity, binocular vision, and all subjective metrics except vision stability between lenses where the test lens was rated to provide more stable vision (p<0.05). Contrary to expectations, incorporating negative SA in single vision soft contact lenses did not improve visual performance in non-presbyopic adult myopes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 24%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,820,862
of 23,862,416 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Optometry
#30
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,492
of 448,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Optometry
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,862,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them