↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Targeted therapy of intracranial glioma model mice with curcumin nanoliposomes

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Targeted therapy of intracranial glioma model mice with curcumin nanoliposomes
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, March 2018
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s157019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ming Zhao, Mengnan Zhao, Chen Fu, Yang Yu, Ailing Fu

Abstract

Glioma is the most aggressive and lethal brain tumor in humans, it comprises about 30 per cent of all brain tumors and central nervous system tumors. The objective of this study was to create novel brain-targeting nanoliposomes to encapsulate curcumin as a promising option for glioma therapy. Human glioma cells (U251MG) were used to determine cell uptake efficiency and possible internalization mechanism of the curcumin-loaded nanoliposomes modified by a brain-targeting peptide RDP. In addition, intracranial glioma mice model was prepared by transplantation of U251MG cells into the mice striatum, and then the liposomes were intravenously administered into the glioma-bearing mice to evaluate the anti-glioma activity. RDP-modified liposomes (RCL) could enter the brain and glioma region, and were internalized by the glioma cells perhaps through acetylcholine receptor-mediated endocytosis pathway. Furthermore, the RCL prolonged the survival time of the glioma-bearing mice from 23 to 33 days, and the inhibition mechanism of the RCL on glioma cell was partly due to cell cycle arrest at the S phase and induction of cell apoptosis. This study would provide a potential approach for targeted delivery of drug-loaded liposomes for glioma treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Master 6 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 22 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 24 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3,598
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,283
of 344,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#70
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.