↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Hepatic encephalopathy: current challenges and future prospects

Overview of attention for article published in Hepatic medicine evidence and research, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 105)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Hepatic encephalopathy: current challenges and future prospects
Published in
Hepatic medicine evidence and research, March 2018
DOI 10.2147/hmer.s118964
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mirashini Swaminathan, Mark Alexander Ellul, Timothy JS Cross

Abstract

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common complication of liver dysfunction, including acute liver failure and liver cirrhosis. HE presents as a spectrum of neuropsychiatric symptoms ranging from subtle fluctuating cognitive impairment to coma. It is a significant contributor of morbidity in patients with liver disease. HE is observed in acute liver failure, liver bypass procedures, for example, shunt surgry and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, and cirrhosis. These are classified as Type A, B and C HE, respectively. HE can also be classified according to whether its presence is overt or covert. The pathogenesis is linked with ammonia and glutamine production, and treatment is based on mechanisms to reduce the formation and/or removal of these compounds. There is no specific diagnostic test for HE, and diagnosis is based on clinical suspicion, excluding other causes and use of clinical tests that may support its diagnosis. Many tests are used in trials and experimentally, but have not yet gained universal acceptance. This review focuses on the definitions, pathogenesis and treatment of HE. Consideration will be given to existing treatment, including avoidance of precipitating factors and novel therapies such as prebiotics, probiotics, antibiotics, laxatives, branched-chain amino acids, shunt embolization and the importance of considering liver transplant in appropriate cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 179 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Student > Master 23 13%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Postgraduate 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 50 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 52 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,341,113
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Hepatic medicine evidence and research
#33
of 105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,143
of 345,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hepatic medicine evidence and research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them