The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 732 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Clinical development of liposome based drugs: formulation, characterization, and therapeutic efficacy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s26766 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ming-Kung Yeh, Hsin-I Chang, Ming-Yen Cheng |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | <1% |
| Unknown | 704 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 170 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 121 | 17% |
| Researcher | 106 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 90 | 12% |
| Other | 29 | 4% |
| Other | 95 | 13% |
| Unknown | 121 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 121 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 97 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 95 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 63 | 9% |
| Other | 124 | 17% |
| Unknown | 160 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2024.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#279
of 4,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,095
of 251,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#5
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,202 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.