| Title |
Comparative study of the in vitro and in vivo characteristics of cationic and neutral liposomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s25399 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wei Zhao, Song Zhuang, Xian-Rong Qi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2014.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,154
of 4,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,601
of 252,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#20
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,202 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.