↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Relationship between pain outcomes and smoking history following video-assisted thoracic surgery for lobectomy: a retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Relationship between pain outcomes and smoking history following video-assisted thoracic surgery for lobectomy: a retrospective study
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, April 2018
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s157957
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tak Kyu Oh, Kwhanmien Kim, Sanghoon Jheon, Sang-Hwan Do, Jung-Won Hwang, Jin Hee Kim, Young-Tae Jeon, In-Ae Song

Abstract

The relationship between chronic smoking history and postoperative pain remains controversial. This study aimed to elucidate this relationship in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy. This retrospective observational study included NSCLC patients treated with VATS lobectomy between January 2011 and July 2017. Demographic and clinical information, including preoperative smoking history, was collected. The primary goal was to investigate the relationship between smoking history and postoperative pain outcomes (oral morphine equivalent [OME] consumption and pain score). Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed, and P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. A total of 1,785 patients were included in the final analysis. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that total smoking amount (in packs), status as current smoker, and cessation time did not have an association with OME consumption (mg) or pain scores on postoperative days 0-2 (P>0.05). However, patients who had never smoked consumed less morphine equivalent analgesics (mg) on postoperative days 0-2 (coefficient: -17.48, 95% CI [-33.83, -1.13], P=0.036) compared to patients who had a history of smoking. Patients who had never smoked had lower opioid analgesics consumption on the days immediately following surgery, while being a current smoker or the total amount of smoking in packs did not affect postoperative pain outcomes after VATS lung lobectomy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 15%
Psychology 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,480,611
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,607
of 1,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,528
of 330,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#40
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.