↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Pathophysiology of placentation abnormalities in pregnancy-induced hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Vascular Health and Risk Management, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Pathophysiology of placentation abnormalities in pregnancy-induced hypertension
Published in
Vascular Health and Risk Management, December 2008
DOI 10.2147/vhrm.s4009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mitsuko Furuya, Junji Ishida, Ichiro Aoki, Akiyoshi Fukamizu

Abstract

During embryogenesis and development, the fetus obtains oxygen and nutrients from the mother through placental microcirculation. The placenta is a distinctive organ that develops and differentiates per se, and that organizes fetal growth and maternal condition in the entire course of gestation. Several life-threatening diseases during pregnancy, such as pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and eclampsia, are closely associated with placental dysfunction. Genetic susceptibilities and poor placentation have been investigated intensively to understand the pathophysiology of PIH. It is currently thought that "poor placentation hypothesis", in which extravillous trophoblasts fail to invade sufficiently the placental bed, explains in part maternal predisposition to this disease. Cumulative studies have suggested that hypoxic micromilieu of fetoplacental site, shear stress of uteroplacental blood flow, and aberrantly secreted proinflammatory substances into maternal circulation synergistically contribute to the progression of PIH. For example, soluble form of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (sVEGFR-1) and soluble form of CD105 are elevated in circulation of PIH mothers. However, it remains to be poorly understood the pathological events in the placenta during the last half of gestation as maternal systemic disorders get worse. For better understanding and effective therapeutic approaches to PIH, it is important to clarify pathological course of PIH-associated changes in the placenta. In this review, current understanding of placental development and the pathophysiology of PIH placenta are summarized. In addition, recent findings of vasoactive signalings in PIH and rodent PIH models are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 126 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Other 29 23%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 23 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#301
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,507
of 179,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.