↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

An evaluation of the budget impact of a new 20% subcutaneous immunoglobulin (Ig20Gly) for the management of primary immunodeficiency diseases in Switzerland

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
An evaluation of the budget impact of a new 20% subcutaneous immunoglobulin (Ig20Gly) for the management of primary immunodeficiency diseases in Switzerland
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, April 2018
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s155641
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard F Pollock, Lisa M Meckley

Abstract

While most individual primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID) are rare, the collective prevalence of PID results in a substantial economic and clinical burden. The aim of this study was to evaluate the budgetary implications of Ig20Gly (Immune Globulin Subcutaneous [human] 20% solution; CUVITRU ® , Baxalta US Inc, now part of Shire Plc, Westlake Village, CA, USA) as a treatment for PID relative to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and other subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) formulations in the Swiss health care setting. A budget impact model was developed in Microsoft Excel to capture the estimated prevalence of PID in Switzerland, the proportion of patients treated in different health care settings, and the costs of administering SCIG and IVIG in each setting. Unit costs were based on a recent cost-minimization analysis of SCIG in Lausanne, and drug costs were taken from the Spezialitätenliste. All costs were reported in 2016 Swiss Francs (CHF), and future costs were not discounted. The total cost of treating PID in Switzerland was estimated to be CHF 11.16 m over 3 years, comprising CHF 9.28 m of drug costs and CHF 1.87 m of ancillary costs, including health care professional time and other administration costs, such as pumps and needle sets. The analysis showed that using Ig20Gly in place of other SCIG formulations would be cost neutral, while using Ig20Gly in place of IVIG would result in savings of 4.0%. Ig20Gly would be cost neutral relative to existing SCIG products and would result in cost savings relative to IVIG in patients with PID in Switzerland, even with modest uptake.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#334
of 531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,892
of 343,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.