Title |
Patients views and experiences in online reporting adverse drug reactions: findings of a national pilot study in Japan
|
---|---|
Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s75761 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michiko Yamamoto, Kiyoshi Kubota, Mitsuhiro Okazaki, Akira Dobashi, Masayuki Hashiguchi, Hirohisa Doi, Machi Suka, Mayumi Mochizuki |
Abstract |
Patients have been allowed to report adverse drug reactions (ADRs) directly to the government in some countries, which would contribute to pharmacovigilance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 42 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 18% |
Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 24% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,726,842
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,434
of 1,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,085
of 359,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.