↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Co-rumination, anxiety, and maladaptive cognitive schemas: when friendship can hurt

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Co-rumination, anxiety, and maladaptive cognitive schemas: when friendship can hurt
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, April 2018
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s144907
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonardo Carlucci, Ines D’Ambrosio, Marco Innamorati, Aristide Saggino, Michela Balsamo

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 24 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 47%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 25 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,443,718
of 26,540,415 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#58
of 818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,163
of 348,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,540,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.