↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Formative usability evaluation of a fixed-dose pen-injector platform device

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Formative usability evaluation of a fixed-dose pen-injector platform device
Published in
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, April 2018
DOI 10.2147/mder.s159733
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jakob Lange, Tobias Nemeth

Abstract

This article for the first time presents a formative usability study of a fixed-dose pen injector platform device used for the subcutaneous delivery of biopharmaceuticals, primarily for self-administration by the patient. The study was conducted with a user population of both naïve and experienced users across a range of ages. The goals of the study were to evaluate whether users could use the devices safely and effectively relying on the instructions for use (IFU) for guidance, as well as to benchmark the device against another similar injector established in the market. Further objectives were to capture any usability issues and obtain participants' subjective ratings on the properties and performance of both devices. A total of 20 participants in three groups studied the IFU and performed simulated injections into an injection pad. All participants were able to use the device successfully. The device was well appreciated by all users with, maximum usability feedback scores reported by 90% or more on handling forces and device feedback, and by 85% or more on fit and grip of the device. The presence of clear audible and visible feedbacks upon successful loading of a dose and completion of injection was seen to be a significant improvement over the benchmark injector. The observation that the platform device can be safely and efficiently used by all user groups provides confidence that the device and IFU in their current form will pass future summative testing in specific applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 29%
Other 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Psychology 1 14%
Decision Sciences 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2018.
All research outputs
#14,533,121
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#154
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,364
of 344,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.