| Title |
Patients' perception and adherence to vaginal dilator therapy: a systematic review and synthesis employing symbolic interactionism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s163273 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yaelim Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 24% |
| Unknown | 27 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Psychology | 7 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,607,213
of 25,623,883 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#214
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,794
of 344,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#6
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,623,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.