Title |
Effects of Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells on neonatal neutrophils
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Inflammation Research, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.2147/jir.s71987 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Imteyaz Khan, Liying Zhang, Moiz Mohammed, Faith E Archer, Jehan Abukharmah, Zengrong Yuan, S Saif Rizvi, Michael G Melek, Arnold B Rabson, Yufang Shi, Barry Weinberger, Anna M Vetrano |
Abstract |
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been proposed as autologous therapy for inflammatory diseases in neonates. MSCs from umbilical cord Wharton's jelly (WJ-MSCs) are accessible, with high proliferative capacity. The effects of WJ-MSCs on neutrophil activity in neonates are not known. We compared the effects of WJ-MSCs on apoptosis and the expression of inflammatory, oxidant, and antioxidant mediators in adult and neonatal neutrophils. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 23% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 27% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 15% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 15% |
Materials Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inflammation Research
#607
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,275
of 369,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inflammation Research
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.