↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Prognostic and clinicopathological value of SIRT3 expression in various cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Prognostic and clinicopathological value of SIRT3 expression in various cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, April 2018
DOI 10.2147/ott.s157836
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yongping Zhou, Sijin Cheng, Sinuo Chen, Yongzhao Zhao

Abstract

Several studies have explored the prognostic value of sirtuin 3 (SIRT3) in various cancers, but obtained inconsistent results. The current systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the association between SIRT3 expression and prognosis in various cancers. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively retrieved by the end of September 29, 2017. All the relevant studies were checked and included in the meta-analysis if they met the inclusion criteria. A total of 17 studies involving 2,865 patients were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The results indicated that SIRT3 expression was not significantly associated with overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR]=0.87, 95% CI=0.59-1.29, P=0.50) and disease-free survival (HR=0.87, 95% CI=0.57-1.31, P=0.50) in total various cancers. However, significant relationship between SIRT3 expression and OS in specific cancers was detected, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (HR=0.48, 95% CI=0.26-0.89, P=0.019), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (HR=0.56, 95% CI=0.42-0.74, P<0.001), pancreatic carcinoma (PC) (HR=0.55, 95% CI=0.30-1.00, P=0.049), renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (HR=0.13, 95% CI=0.02-0.98, P=0.048), breast cancer (BC) (HR=2.53, 95% CI=1.83-3.67, P<0.001), colon cancer (CC) (HR=1.87, 95% CI=1.12-3.26, P=0.022) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (HR=2.20, 95% CI=1.38-3.50, P=0.001). Moreover, SIRT3 expression was obviously associated with tumor size (odds ratio [OR]=1.41, 95% CI=1.02-1.94, P=0.04), tumor differentiation (OR=1.52, 95% CI=1.08-2.16, P=0.02) and clinical stage (OR=2.07, 95% CI=1.23-3.46, P=0.01) in HCC. SIRT3 was distinctly related to the OS in specific cancers. SIRT3 was an unfavorable prognostic factor in BC, CC and NSCLC; however, it was also a favorable prognostic factor in CLL, HCC, PC and RCC, especially in HCC.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Engineering 2 11%
Psychology 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#2,078
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,768
of 343,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#77
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.