↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The mutation of hepatitis B virus and the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgery: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
The mutation of hepatitis B virus and the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgery: a pilot study
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, March 2018
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s160047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yaojun Zhang, Junting Huang, Jinbin Chen, Keli Yang, Jiancong Chen, Li Xu, Zhongguo Zhou, Minshan Chen

Abstract

Although hepatitis B virus (HBV) is still one of the most common etiological factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the association between the HBV mutations and the clinical characteristics and prognosis of HBV-related HCC patients (HBV-HCC) after surgical resection remains largely unknown. A cohort of 131 consecutive patients who received hepatectomy for HBV-HCC were retrospectively enrolled. The HBV genotype and 14 genomic mutations, which have been reported to relate to HCC in liver samples, were sequenced. The associations between the genomic mutations and clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed. Both A1762T/G1764A mutation and Pre S deletion related to worse overall survival (OS, p=0.040 and p<0.001, respectively) and disease-free survival (DFS, p=0.040 and p<0.001, respectively), G1899A mutation related to worse OS (p=0.030), A1762T/G1764A mutation correlated with tumor size (r=0.204, p=0.019), G1899A mutation correlated with vascular invasion (r=0.332, p<0.001), and Pre S deletion correlated with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP; r=0.254, p=0.003) positively. Multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazards model revealed that both A1762T/G1764A mutation and Pre S deletion were independent prognostic factors for OS (hazard ratio [HR]=3.701, 95% CI=1.390-9.855, p=0.009, and HR=4.816, 95% CI=2.311-10.032, p<0.001, respectively) and DFS (HR=3.245, 95% CI=1.400-7.521, p=0.006, and HR=2.437, 95% CI=1.311-4.530, p<0.001, respectively), and patients with dual mutations were found to have the worst OS and DFS (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Patients with A1762T/G1764A mutation or Pre S deletion were more likely to have early recurrence (p=0.042 and p=0.019, respectively). HBV DNA genomic mutations in A1762T/G1764A and Pre S deletion were associated with worse prognoses and early recurrence for HBV-HCC patients after surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,481,952
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#1,404
of 2,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,261
of 442,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#36
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,017 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.