↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Shear bond strength of a bracket-bonding system cured with a light-emitting diode or halogen-based light-curing unit at various polymerization times

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Shear bond strength of a bracket-bonding system cured with a light-emitting diode or halogen-based light-curing unit at various polymerization times
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry, April 2018
DOI 10.2147/ccide.s155829
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanjay Prasad Gupta, Basanta Kumar Shrestha

Abstract

To determine and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of bracket-bonding system cured with light-emitting diode (LED) and halogen-based light-curing unit at various polymerization times. Ninety six human maxillary premolar teeth extracted for orthodontic purpose were divided into four groups, according to the light-curing unit and exposure times used. In the halogen group, the specimens were light cured for 20 and 40 seconds. In the LED group, the specimens were light cured for 5 and 10 seconds. Stainless steel brackets were bonded with Enlight bonding system, stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours and then submitted to SBS testing in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Adhesive remnant index (ARI) was used to evaluate the amount of adhesive remaining on the teeth determined by stereomicroscope at 10× magnification. The highest mean SBS was obtained with the halogen 40 seconds (18.27 MPa) followed by halogen 20 seconds (15.36 MPa), LED 10 seconds (14.60 MPa) and least with LED 5 seconds (12.49 MPa) group. According to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's multiple-comparison test, SBS of halogen 20 seconds group was not significantly different from halogen 40 seconds group, LED 5 seconds group and LED 10 seconds group, whereas halogen 40 seconds group was significantly different from LED 5 seconds and LED 10 seconds group. The method of light curing did not influence the ARI, with score 2 being predominant. Polymerization with both halogen and LED resulted in SBS values that were clinically acceptable for orthodontic treatment in all groups. Hence, for bonding orthodontic brackets, photoactivation with halogen for 20 seconds and LED for 5 seconds is suggested.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 44%
Psychology 1 6%
Unknown 9 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2018.
All research outputs
#17,562,823
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,266
of 344,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them