↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Hedgehog signaling in cancer stem cells: a focus on hematological cancers

Overview of attention for article published in Stem cells and cloning advances and applications, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Hedgehog signaling in cancer stem cells: a focus on hematological cancers
Published in
Stem cells and cloning advances and applications, January 2015
DOI 10.2147/sccaa.s58613
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria Campbell, Mhairi Copland

Abstract

The stem cell paradigm was first demonstrated in hematopoietic stem cells. Whilst classically it was cytokines and chemokines which were believed to control stem cell fate, more recently it has become apparent that the stem cell niche and highly conserved embryonic pathways play a key role in governing stem cell behavior. One of these pathways, the hedgehog signaling pathway, found in all organisms, is vitally important in embryogenesis, performing the function of patterning through early stages of development, and in adulthood, through the control of somatic stem cell numbers. In addition to these roles in health however, it has been found to be deregulated in a number of solid and hematological malignancies, components of the hedgehog pathway being associated with a poor prognosis. Further, these components represent viable therapeutic targets, with inhibition from a drug development perspective being readily achieved, making the hedgehog pathway an attractive potential therapeutic target. However, although the concept of cancer stem cells is well established, how these cells arise and the factors which influence their behavior are not yet fully understood. The role of the hedgehog signaling pathway and its potential as a therapeutic target in hematological malignancies is the focus of this review.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 27%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Other 4 5%
Student > Master 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 7%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2015.
All research outputs
#15,875,393
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Stem cells and cloning advances and applications
#42
of 68 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,152
of 360,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem cells and cloning advances and applications
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.