↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Awareness regarding clinical application of pharmacogenetics among Japanese pharmacists

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Awareness regarding clinical application of pharmacogenetics among Japanese pharmacists
Published in
Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, January 2015
DOI 10.2147/pgpm.s71813
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taku Obara, Shinya Abe, Michihiro Satoh, Sergio Ramón Gutiérrez Ubeda, Shoko Yoshimachi, Teruaki Goto

Abstract

Advances in pharmacogenetic analysis technology have accelerated the movement to incorporate pharmacogenetic analysis data into medicine. Therefore, pharmacists will soon have to provide guidance and raise pharmaceutical questions regarding prescriptions based on patient pharmacogenomic information. The objective of this study was to clarify Japanese pharmacists' awareness of pharmacogenetics. We conducted a postal questionnaire survey among 372 pharmacists belonging to Tsuruha Holdings. Available data were collected from 268 pharmacists (male [n=133], <40 years old [n=170], drugstore pharmacists [n=182]). Of the pharmacists, 19.0% of the population were aware of the Ethical Guidelines for Human Genome/ Gene Analysis Research in Japan, 31.0% of the population had heard either or both the terms "pharmacogenomics" and "pharmacogenetics", and 16.8% of the population were aware that health insurance covered pharmacogenomic tests performed before prescription in Japan. Only 0.4% indicated that they could raise pharmaceutical questions regarding prescriptions based on patients' pharmacogenomic information, and 61.2% of the population indicated a preference to undertake pharmacogenomic tests to predict the efficacy or adverse reactions of a drug. We found a need for actions to improve the awareness of pharmacists about pharmacogenetics and create an environment in which pharmacists are able to provide appropriate medical service based on pharmacogenomic information.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Unspecified 4 10%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 12%
Unspecified 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 9 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2015.
All research outputs
#6,542,209
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,265
of 361,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them