↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Acquired auditory-visual synesthesia: A window to early cross-modal sensory interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Acquired auditory-visual synesthesia: A window to early cross-modal sensory interactions
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, January 2009
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s4481
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pegah Afra, Michael Funke, Fumisuke Matsuo

Abstract

Synesthesia is experienced when sensory stimulation of one sensory modality elicits an involuntary sensation in another sensory modality. Auditory-visual synesthesia occurs when auditory stimuli elicit visual sensations. It has developmental, induced and acquired varieties. The acquired variety has been reported in association with deafferentation of the visual system as well as temporal lobe pathology with intact visual pathways. The induced variety has been reported in experimental and post-surgical blindfolding, as well as intake of hallucinogenic or psychedelics. Although in humans there is no known anatomical pathway connecting auditory areas to primary and/or early visual association areas, there is imaging and neurophysiologic evidence to the presence of early cross modal interactions between the auditory and visual sensory pathways. Synesthesia may be a window of opportunity to study these cross modal interactions. Here we review the existing literature in the acquired and induced auditory-visual synesthesias and discuss the possible neural mechanisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
China 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 85 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Student > Master 18 20%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 41%
Neuroscience 10 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 10 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,685,541
of 24,677,985 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#93
of 693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,553
of 181,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,677,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them