↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The analgesic effect of combined treatment with intranasal S-ketamine and intranasal midazolam compared with morphine patient-controlled analgesia in spinal surgery patients: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
The analgesic effect of combined treatment with intranasal S-ketamine and intranasal midazolam compared with morphine patient-controlled analgesia in spinal surgery patients: a pilot study
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, February 2015
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s75928
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Riediger, Manuel Haschke, Christoph Bitter, Thomas Fabbro, Stefan Schaeren, Albert Urwyler, Wilhelm Ruppen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Researcher 3 4%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 22 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 25 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,629,662
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#872
of 1,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,582
of 362,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.