Title |
Reanalysis of morphine consumption from two randomized controlled trials of gabapentin using longitudinal statistical methods
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s56558 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shiyuan Zhang, James Paul, Manyat Nantha-Aree, Norman Buckley, Uswa Shahzad, Ji Cheng, Justin DeBeer, Mitchell Winemaker, David Wismer, Dinshaw Punthakee, Victoria Avram, Lehana Thabane |
Abstract |
Postoperative pain management in total joint replacement surgery remains ineffective in up to 50% of patients and has an overwhelming impact in terms of patient well-being and health care burden. We present here an empirical analysis of two randomized controlled trials assessing whether addition of gabapentin to a multimodal perioperative analgesia regimen can reduce morphine consumption or improve analgesia for patients following total joint arthroplasty (the MOBILE trials). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 39 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 20% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 13% |
Researcher | 5 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 53% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,202,008
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#441
of 1,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,673
of 353,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.