↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
914 Mendeley
Title
Noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2014
DOI 10.2147/copd.s42664
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arantxa Mas, Josep Masip

Abstract

After the institution of positive-pressure ventilation, the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) through an interface substantially increased. The first technique was continuous positive airway pressure; but, after the introduction of pressure support ventilation at the end of the 20th century, this became the main modality. Both techniques, and some others that have been recently introduced and which integrate some technological innovations, have extensively demonstrated a faster improvement of acute respiratory failure in different patient populations, avoiding endotracheal intubation and facilitating the release of conventional invasive mechanical ventilation. In acute settings, NIV is currently the first-line treatment for moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation as well as for acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema and should be considered in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory insufficiency, in difficult weaning, and in the prevention of postextubation failure. Alternatively, it can also be used in the postoperative period and in cases of pneumonia and asthma or as a palliative treatment. NIV is currently used in a wide range of acute settings, such as critical care and emergency departments, hospital wards, palliative or pediatric units, and in pre-hospital care. It is also used as a home care therapy in patients with chronic pulmonary or sleep disorders. The appropriate selection of patients and the adaptation to the technique are the keys to success. This review essentially analyzes the evidence of benefits of NIV in different populations with acute respiratory failure and describes the main modalities, new devices, and some practical aspects of the use of this technique.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 914 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 906 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 5%
Student > Postgraduate 46 5%
Student > Master 39 4%
Researcher 26 3%
Other 25 3%
Other 57 6%
Unknown 672 74%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 162 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 <1%
Engineering 4 <1%
Neuroscience 4 <1%
Other 19 2%
Unknown 678 74%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,204,882
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#824
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,632
of 240,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.