↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Lower airway colonization and inflammatory response in COPD: a focus on Haemophilus influenzae

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Lower airway colonization and inflammatory response in COPD: a focus on Haemophilus influenzae
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, October 2014
DOI 10.2147/copd.s54477
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lydia J Finney, Andrew Ritchie, Elizabeth Pollard, Sebastian L Johnston, Patrick Mallia

Abstract

Bacterial infection of the lower respiratory tract in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients is common both in stable patients and during acute exacerbations. The most frequent bacteria detected in COPD patients is Haemophilus influenzae, and it appears this organism is uniquely adapted to exploit immune deficiencies associated with COPD and to establish persistent infection in the lower respiratory tract. The presence of bacteria in the lower respiratory tract in stable COPD is termed colonization; however, there is increasing evidence that this is not an innocuous phenomenon but is associated with airway inflammation, increased symptoms, and increased risk for exacerbations. In this review, we discuss host immunity that offers protection against H. influenzae and how disturbance of these mechanisms, combined with pathogen mechanisms of immune evasion, promote persistence of H. influenzae in the lower airways in COPD. In addition, we examine the role of H. influenzae in COPD exacerbations, as well as interactions between H. influenzae and respiratory virus infections, and review the role of treatments and their effect on COPD outcomes. This review focuses predominantly on data derived from human studies but will refer to animal studies where they contribute to understanding the disease in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Unknown 106 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Postgraduate 12 11%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 26 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2015.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#2,403
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,182
of 265,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#23
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.