↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Reliability and validity of the Athens Insomnia Scale in chronic pain patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Reliability and validity of the Athens Insomnia Scale in chronic pain patients
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, April 2018
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s154852
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kiyoka Enomoto, Tomonori Adachi, Keiko Yamada, Daisuke Inoue, Miho Nakanishi, Tomohiko Nishigami, Masahiko Shibata

Abstract

To confirm the psychometric properties of the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) among Japanese chronic pain patients. In total, 144 outpatients were asked to complete questionnaires comprising the AIS and other study measures. According to the original article, the AIS has 2 versions: the AIS-8 (full version) and the AIS-5 (brief version). To validate the AIS-8 and AIS-5 among chronic pain patients, we confirmed: 1) factor structure by confirmatory factor analysis; 2) internal consistency by Cronbach's a; 3) test-retest reliability using with interclass correlation coefficients; 4) known-group validity; 5) concurrent validity; and 6) cut-off values by receiver operating characteristic analysis. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted to assess the participants' sleep disturbance. If the participants had any sleep complaints, including difficulty in initiating sleep, difficulty in maintaining sleep, and early morning awakening, they were defined as insomnia symptoms. A 2-factor model of the AIS-8 and 1-factor model of the AIS-5 demonstrated good fit. The AIS had adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Patients with insomnia had a higher AIS score than those without insomnia. The sleep disturbance measured by the AIS was positively associated with pain intensity, disability, depression, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing, and negatively associated with pain-related self-efficacy. The cut-off values for detecting insomnia were estimated at 8 points in the AIS-8 and 4 points in the AIS-5. The AIS-8 and AIS-5 had adequate reliability and validity in chronic pain patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Professor 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 29 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Psychology 5 8%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 32 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2018.
All research outputs
#13,592,375
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#937
of 1,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,035
of 330,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#28
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.