↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Physiotherapy for human T-lymphotropic virus 1-associated myelopathy: review of the literature and future perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Physiotherapy for human T-lymphotropic virus 1-associated myelopathy: review of the literature and future perspectives
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, February 2015
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s71978
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katia N Sá, Maíra C Macêdo, Rosana P Andrade, Selena D Mendes, José V Martins, Abrahão F Baptista

Abstract

Human T-lymphotropic virus 1 (HTLV-1) infection may be associated with damage to the spinal cord - HTLV-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis - and other neurological symptoms that compromise everyday life activities. There is no cure for this disease, but recent evidence suggests that physiotherapy may help individuals with the infection, although, as far as we are aware, no systematic review has approached this topic. Therefore, the objective of this review is to address the core problems associated with HTLV-1 infection that can be detected and treated by physiotherapy, present the results of clinical trials, and discuss perspectives on the development of knowledge in this area. Major problems for individuals with HTLV-1 are pain, sensory-motor dysfunction, and urinary symptoms. All of these have high impact on quality of life, and recent clinical trials involving exercises, electrotherapeutic modalities, and massage have shown promising effects. Although not influencing the basic pathologic disturbances, a physiotherapeutic approach seems to be useful to detect specific problems related to body structures, activity, and participation related to movement in HTLV-1 infection, as well as to treat these conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 80 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 20%
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 18 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#765
of 1,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,091
of 361,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.