↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Pessary use in stress urinary incontinence: a review of advantages, complications, patient satisfaction, and quality of life

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Pessary use in stress urinary incontinence: a review of advantages, complications, patient satisfaction, and quality of life
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, April 2018
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s152616
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ghadeer Al-Shaikh, Sadiqa Syed, Somaia Osman, Abdulrahman Bogis, Ahmed Al-Badr

Abstract

Stress urinary incontinnce (SUI) is a common condition among women. The usual approach to treatment of SUI is a stepwise plan from conservative to surgical procedures. A vaginal pessary is one of the commonly used conservative treatments that offer symptomatic improvement for women with incontinence. This review provides a critical analysis of the benefits and shortcomings offered by vaginal pessaries to patients affected by SUI, with a particular focus on indications, advantages, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and potential complications. To obtain the required information, an extensive search of PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed, covering the time frame from January 2000 to December 2016. We also surveyed the published guidelines of American Urological Association, Canadian Urological Association, American Urogynecological Society, National Institutes of Health (USA), and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK). A total of 192 original research papers, review articles, and clinical trials were identified. The analysis of retrieved data provides evidence that vaginal pessaries constitute an effective nonsurgical option for SUI. The satisfaction rate with pessary use is high and only minor complications, if any, occur, vaginal discharge being the most common. The reviewed studies document that vaginal pessaries provide an adequate control of SUI if they are fit properly and managed by frequent replacements and regular checkups. They should be considered among the first line of treatment for SUI associated with exercise and increased intra-abdominal pressure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Other 9 8%
Researcher 9 8%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 40 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 45 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,441,758
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#136
of 797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,094
of 330,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.