↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Omalizumab for severe asthma: toward personalized treatment based on biomarker profile and clinical history

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asthma and Allergy, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Omalizumab for severe asthma: toward personalized treatment based on biomarker profile and clinical history
Published in
Journal of Asthma and Allergy, April 2018
DOI 10.2147/jaa.s107982
Pubmed ID
Authors

Farnaz Tabatabaian, Dennis K Ledford

Abstract

Asthma is a heterogeneous syndrome with numerous underlining molecular and inflammatory mechanisms contributing to the wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes. Multiple therapies targeting severe asthma with type 2 (T2) high inflammation are or soon will be available. T2 high inflammation is defined as inflammation associated with atopy or eosinophilia or an increase in cytokines associated with T-helper 2 lymphocytes. Omalizumab is a humanized anti-IgE monoclonal antibody and the first biologic therapy approved for moderate-severe allergic asthma. Despite the specificity of biologic therapies like omalizumab, clinical response is variable, with approximately 50% of treated patients achieving the primary outcome. A prior identification of the ideal candidate for therapy would improve patient outcomes and optimize the use of health care resources. As the number of biologic therapies for asthma increases, the goal is identification of biomarkers or clinical phenotypes likely to respond to a specific therapy. This review focuses on potential biomarkers and clinical history that may identify responders to omalizumab therapy for asthma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Other 8 8%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 50 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 47 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,807,800
of 23,967,950 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#195
of 489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,894
of 333,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,967,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.