↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Unicentric study of cell therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/pulmonary emphysema

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Unicentric study of cell therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/pulmonary emphysema
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, January 2011
DOI 10.2147/copd.s15292
Pubmed ID
Authors

João Tadeu Ribeiro-Paes, Aldemir Bilaqui, Oswaldo T Greco, Milton Artur Ruiz, Monica Y Marcelino, Talita Stessuk, Carolina A de Faria, Mario R Lago

Abstract

Within the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) spectrum, lung emphysema presents, as a primarily histopathologic feature, the destruction of pulmonary parenchyma and, accordingly, an increase in the airflow obstruction distal to the terminal bronchiole. Notwithstanding the significant advances in prevention and treatment of symptoms, no effective or curative therapy has been accomplished. In this context, cellular therapy with stem cells (SCs) arises as a new therapeutic approach, with a wide application potential. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of SCs infusion procedure in patients with advanced COPD (stage IV dyspnea). After selection, patients underwent clinical examination and received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, immediately prior to the bone marrow harvest. The bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC) were isolated and infused into a peripheral vein. The 12-month follow-up showed a significant improvement in the quality of life, as well as a clinical stable condition, which suggest a change in the natural process of the disease. Therefore, the proposed methodology in this study for BMMC cell therapy in sufferers of advanced COPD was demonstrated to be free of significant adverse effects. Although a larger sample and a greater follow-up period are needed, it is possible to infer that BMMC cell therapy introduces an unprecedented change in the course or in the natural history of emphysema, inhibiting or slowing the progression of disease. This clinical trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01110252) and was approved by the Brazilian National Committee of Ethics in Research (registration no. 14764, CONEP report 233/2009).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 100 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Other 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 34 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 36 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#2,403
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,589
of 190,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.