| Title |
Considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ccide.s42016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christa D Hopp, Martin F Land |
| Abstract |
This review of ceramic inlays in posterior teeth includes a review of the history of ceramic restorations, followed by common indications and contraindications for their use. A discussion on the potential for tooth wear is followed by a review of recommended preparation design considerations, fabrication methods, and material choices. Despite the improved materials available for fabrication of porcelain inlays, fracture remains a primary mode of inlay failure. Therefore, a brief discussion on strengthening methods for ceramics is included. The review concludes with a section on luting considerations, and offers the clinician specific recommendations for luting procedures. In conclusion, inlay success rates and longevity, as reported in the literature, are summarized. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 209 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 7% |
| Researcher | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 54 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 123 | 58% |
| Materials Science | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 59 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,413,871
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,878
of 213,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them