Title |
Early enteral and parenteral nutritional support after hepatectomy in patients with hepatic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
OncoTargets and therapy, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/ott.s73275 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lin-Ben Gao, He Tian, Xing-Guang Wang, Xiao-Fei Yu, Yan Guan, Ming-Lu Chen, Jian Zhang |
Abstract |
This study sought to conduct a systematic review providing a comparative analysis of enteral nutrition (EN) and parenteral nutrition (PN) after hepatectomy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 16% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 16% |
Computer Science | 2 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 24% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2015.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#982
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,126
of 270,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.