Title |
Impact of patient programs on adherence and persistence in inflammatory and immunologic diseases: a meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s77053 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chakkarin Burudpakdee, Zeba M Khan, Smeet Gala, Merena Nanavaty, Satyin Kaura |
Abstract |
Patient adherence and persistence is important to improve outcomes in chronic conditions, including inflammatory and immunologic (I&I) diseases. Patient programs that aim at improving medication adherence or persistence play an essential role in optimizing care. This meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of patient programs in the therapeutic area of I&I diseases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 7 | 15% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
Librarian | 4 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 22% |
Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 30% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 13% |
Psychology | 5 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2015.
All research outputs
#14,474,215
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#726
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,850
of 270,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.