↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: How to deal with this life-threatening cirrhosis complication?

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: How to deal with this life-threatening cirrhosis complication?
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, October 2008
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s2688
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tarsila CR Ribeiro, Julio MF Chebli, Mario Kondo, Pedro Duarte Gaburri, Liliana Andrade Chebli, Ana Cristina Amaral Feldner

Abstract

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is one of the most common and life-threatening complications of cirrhosis. It occurs in 10% to 30% of patients admitted to hospital and recent studies tend to demonstrate that SBP incidence seems to be decreasing in its frequency. A bacterial overgrowth with translocation through the increased permeable small intestinal wall and impaired defense mechanisms is considered to be the main mechanism associated with its occurrence. The Gram-negative aerobic bacteria are the major responsible for SBP episodes and Gram-positive bacteria, mainly Staphylococcus aureus, are being considered an emergent agent causing SBP. The prompt diagnosis of SBP is the key factor for reduction observed in mortality rates in recent years. The clinical diagnosis of SBP is neither sensitive nor specific and the search for new practical and available tools for a rapid diagnosis of SBP is an important endpoint of current studies. Reagent strips were considered a promising and faster way of SBP diagnosis. The prompt use of empirical antibiotics, mostly cefotaxime, improves significantly the short-term prognosis of cirrhotic patients with SBP. The recurrence rate of SBP is high and antibiotic prophylaxis has been recommended in high-risk settings. Unfortunately, the long-term prognosis remains poor.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 5%
Egypt 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 26%
Student > Postgraduate 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Professor 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 49%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Engineering 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2022.
All research outputs
#15,740,207
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#705
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,462
of 101,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.