| Title |
Effectiveness of exercise programs to reduce falls in older people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s71691 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elissa Burton, Vinicius Cavalheri, Richard Adams, Colleen Oakley Browne, Petra Bovery-Spencer, Audra M Fenton, Bruce W Campbell, Keith D Hill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 34% |
| United States | 8 | 15% |
| Ireland | 3 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 21% |
| Scientists | 9 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 406 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 403 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 86 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 9% |
| Researcher | 34 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 74 | 18% |
| Unknown | 102 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 89 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 22% |
| Sports and Recreations | 24 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 5% |
| Psychology | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 48 | 12% |
| Unknown | 119 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#854,090
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#72
of 1,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,234
of 365,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#3
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.