↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of stress fractures in the lower extremity in runners

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 260)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
23 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
390 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of stress fractures in the lower extremity in runners
Published in
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s39512
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leamor Kahanov, Lindsey E Eberman, Kenneth E Games, Mitch Wasik

Abstract

Stress fractures account for between 1% and 20% of athletic injuries, with 80% of stress fractures in the lower extremity. Stress fractures of the lower extremity are common injuries among individuals who participate in endurance, high load-bearing activities such as running, military and aerobic exercise and therefore require practitioner expertise in diagnosis and management. Accurate diagnosis for stress fractures is dependent on the anatomical area. Anatomical regions such as the pelvis, sacrum, and metatarsals offer challenges due to difficulty differentiating pathologies with common symptoms. Special tests and treatment regimes, however, are similar among most stress fractures with resolution between 4 weeks to a year. The most difficult aspect of stress fracture treatment entails mitigating internal and external risk factors. Practitioners should address ongoing risk factors to minimize recurrence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 385 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 62 16%
Student > Master 45 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 9%
Student > Postgraduate 29 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 7%
Other 88 23%
Unknown 102 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 127 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 15%
Sports and Recreations 49 13%
Unspecified 7 2%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 29 7%
Unknown 113 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#803,887
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#21
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,748
of 271,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them