↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Modafinil: a novel alternative to non-invasive ventilation in hypercapnic respiratory failure?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Modafinil: a novel alternative to non-invasive ventilation in hypercapnic respiratory failure?
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, April 2015
DOI 10.2147/copd.s83558
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio. M Esquinas, Paulo Matos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2015.
All research outputs
#3,530,742
of 4,991,699 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#424
of 593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,594
of 150,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,991,699 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 593 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.