Report for: Platelet function tests: a comparative review

Title	Platelet function tests: a comparative review
Published in	Vascular Health and Risk Management, February 2015
DOI	10.2147/vhrm.s44469
Pubmed ID	25733843
Authors	Rita Paniccia, Raffaella Priora, Agatina Alessandrello Liotta, Rosanna Abbate

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 575 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Brazil	2	<1%
Colombia	1	<1%
Chile	1	<1%
Belgium	1	<1%
Spain	1	<1%
Japan	1	<1%
United States	1	<1%
Unknown	567	99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Researcher	73	13%
Student > Master	72	13%
Student > Bachelor	71	12%
Student > Ph. D. Student	66	11%
Other	49	9%
Other	135	23%
Unknown	109	19%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	190	33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology	53	9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	47	8%
Engineering	33	6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science	28	5%
Other	94	16%
Unknown	130	23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.

All research outputs

#1,715,268

of 23,213,531 outputs

Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management

#45

of 763 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#25,802

of 354,499 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management

of 41 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Platelet function tests: a comparative review

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context