↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Specialty-care access for community health clinic patients: processes and barriers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Specialty-care access for community health clinic patients: processes and barriers
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, February 2018
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s152594
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mabel C Ezeonwu

Abstract

Community health clinics/centers (CHCs) comprise the US's core health-safety net and provide primary care to anyone who walks through their doors. However, access to specialty care for CHC patients is a big challenge. In this descriptive qualitative study, semistructured interviews of 37 referral coordinators of CHCs were used to describe their perspectives on processes and barriers to patients' access to specialty care. Analysis of data was done using content analysis. The process of coordinating care referrals for CHC patients is complex and begins with a provider's order for consultation and ends when the referring provider receives the specialist's note. Poverty, specialist and referral coordinator shortages, lack of insurance, insurance acceptability by providers, transport and clinic-location factors, lack of clinic-hospital affiliations, and poor communication between primary and specialty providers constitute critical barriers to specialty-care access for patients. Understanding the complexities of specialty-care coordination processes and access helps determine the need for comprehensive and uninterrupted access to quality health care for vulnerable populations. Guaranteed access to primary care at CHCs has not translated into improved access to specialty care. It is critical that effective policies be pursued to address the barriers and minimize interruptions in care, and to ensure continuity of care for all patients needing specialty care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 29 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 31 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2018.
All research outputs
#18,604,390
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#646
of 834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,713
of 440,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.