↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Programs to improve adolescent sexual and reproductive health in the US: a review of the evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 145)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Title
Programs to improve adolescent sexual and reproductive health in the US: a review of the evidence
Published in
Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, April 2015
DOI 10.2147/ahmt.s48054
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Manlove, Heather Fish, Kristin Anderson Moore

Abstract

US adolescents have high rates of teen pregnancy, childbearing, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), highlighting the need to identify and implement effective programs that will help improve teen sexual and reproductive health. This review identified 103 random-assignment evaluations of 85 programs that incorporated intent-to-treat analyses and assessed impacts on pregnancy, childbearing, STIs, and their key determinants - sexual activity, number of sexual partners, condom use, and other contraceptive use - among teens. This review describes the evidence base for five broad program approaches, including abstinence education, comprehensive sex education, clinic-based programs, youth development programs, and parent-youth relationship programs. We also describe programs with impacts on key outcomes, including pregnancy/childbearing, STIs, and those that found impacts on both sexual activity and contraceptive use. Our review identified 52 effective programs: 38 with consistent impacts on reproductive health outcomes, and 14 with mixed findings (across subpopulations, follow-ups, or multiple measures of a single outcome). We found that a variety of program approaches produced impacts on sexual and reproductive health outcomes. Parent-youth relationship programs and clinic-based program evaluations more frequently showed impacts than other program approaches, although we also identified a number of abstinence-education, comprehensive sex education, and youth-development programs with impacts on sexual and reproductive health outcomes. Overall, we identified nine program evaluations with impacts on teen pregnancies or births, five with impacts on reducing STIs, and 15 with impacts on both delaying/reducing sexual activity and increasing contraceptive use (including condom use). Future efforts should conduct replications of existing program evaluations, identify implementation components linked to impacts, rigorously evaluate programs that appear promising, and expand the evidence base on programs that impact hormonal and long-acting contraceptive method use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 179 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 22%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 55 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 36 20%
Social Sciences 30 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 16%
Psychology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 59 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,170,784
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#28
of 145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,296
of 279,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them