↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Repeated vertebral augmentation for new vertebral compression fractures of postvertebral augmentation patients: a nationwide cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Repeated vertebral augmentation for new vertebral compression fractures of postvertebral augmentation patients: a nationwide cohort study
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, March 2015
DOI 10.2147/cia.s80668
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng-Loong Liang, Hao-Kwan Wang, Fei-Kai Syu, Kuo-Wei Wang, Kang Lu, Po-Chou Liliang

Abstract

Postvertebral augmentation vertebral compression fractures are common; repeated vertebral augmentation is usually performed for prompt pain relief. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of repeat vertebral augmentation. We performed a retrospective, nationwide, population-based longitudinal observation study, using the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan. All patients who received vertebral augmentation for vertebral compression fractures were evaluated. The collected data included patient characteristics (demographics, comorbidities, and medication exposure) and repeat vertebral augmentation. Kaplan-Meier and stratified Cox proportional hazard regressions were performed for analyses. The overall incidence of repeat vertebral augmentation was 11.3% during the follow-up until 2010. Patients with the following characteristics were at greater risk for repeat vertebral augmentation: female sex (AOR=1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-2.36), advanced age (AOR=1.60; 95% CI: 1.32-2.08), diabetes mellitus (AOR=4.31; 95% CI: 4.05-5.88), cerebrovascular disease (AOR=4.09; 95% CI: 3.44-5.76), dementia (AOR=1.97; 95% CI: 1.69-2.33), blindness or low vision (AOR=3.72; 95% CI: 2.32-3.95), hypertension (AOR=2.58; 95% CI: 2.35-3.47), and hyperlipidemia (AOR=2.09; 95% CI: 1.67-2.22). Patients taking calcium/vitamin D (AOR=2.98; 95% CI: 1.83-3.93), bisphosphonates (AOR=2.11; 95% CI: 1.26-2.61), or calcitonin (AOR=4.59; 95% CI: 3.40-5.77) were less likely to undergo repeat vertebral augmentation; however, those taking steroids (AOR=7.28; 95% CI: 6.32-8.08), acetaminophen (AOR=3.54; 95% CI: 2.75-4.83), or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (AOR=6.14; 95% CI: 5.08-7.41) were more likely to undergo repeat vertebral augmentation. We conclude that the incidence of repeat vertebral augmentation is rather high. An understanding of risk factors predicting repeat vertebral augmentation provides valuable basis to improve health care for geriatric populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Other 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Psychology 2 3%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2015.
All research outputs
#16,580,157
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,175
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,305
of 270,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#21
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.