↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Optimizing psychological interventions for trichotillomania (hair-pulling disorder): an update on current empirical status

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Optimizing psychological interventions for trichotillomania (hair-pulling disorder): an update on current empirical status
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, April 2015
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s53977
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivar Snorrason, Gregory S Berlin, Han-Joo Lee

Abstract

Trichotillomania (hair-pulling disorder) is a psychiatric condition characterized by a persistent habit of pulling out one's hair. In treatment-seeking populations, hair-pulling disorder can be severe, chronic, and difficult to treat. In the early 1970s, behavioral interventions (eg, habit reversal training) were developed and proved effective in treating chronic hair-pulling for many individuals. In order to further increase treatment efficacy and improve long-term outcome, several authors have developed augmented treatment protocols that combine traditional behavioral strategies with other cognitive-behavioral interventions, including cognitive therapy, dialectical behavioral therapy, and acceptance and commitment therapy. In the present review, we give an overview of the clinical and diagnostic features of hair-pulling disorder, describe different cognitive-behavioral interventions, and evaluate research on their efficacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 27%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 19 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,875,830
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#94
of 553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,074
of 264,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.