↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Patient factors influencing dermal filler complications: prevention, assessment, and treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
Title
Patient factors influencing dermal filler complications: prevention, assessment, and treatment
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, April 2015
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s80446
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koenraad De Boulle, Izolda Heydenrych

Abstract

While rare, complications do occur with the esthetic use of dermal fillers. Careful attention to patient factors and technique can do much to avoid these complications, and a well-informed practitioner can mitigate problems when they do occur. Since cosmetic surgery is usually an elective process, requested by the patient, clinical trials are complex to organize and run. For this reason, an international group of practicing physicians in the field of esthetics came together to share knowledge and to try and produce some informed guidance for their colleagues, considering the literature and also pooling their own extensive clinical experience. This manuscript aims to summarize the crucial aspects of patient selection, including absolute contraindications as well as situations that warrant caution, and also covers important considerations for the pre- and posttreatment periods as well as during the procedure itself. Guidance is given on both immediate and long-term management of adverse reactions. The majority of complications are related to accepting patients inappropriate for treatment or issues of sterility, placement, volume, and injection technique. It is clear that esthetic practitioners need an in-depth knowledge of all aspects of treatment with dermal fillers to achieve optimal outcomes for their patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Unknown 184 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 15%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Postgraduate 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 10%
Other 15 8%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 50 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 52 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,571,725
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#326
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,169
of 279,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.