↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Information and decision-making needs among people with affective disorders – results of an online survey

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Information and decision-making needs among people with affective disorders – results of an online survey
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, May 2015
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s78495
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Liebherz, Lisa Tlach, Martin Härter, Jörg Dirmaier

Abstract

Patient decision aids are one possibility for enabling and encouraging patients to participate in medical decisions. This paper aims to describe patients' information and decision-making needs as a prerequisite for the development of high-quality, web-based patient decision aids for affective disorders. We conducted an online cross-sectional survey by using a self-administered questionnaire including items on Internet use, online health information needs, role in decision making, and important treatment decisions, performing descriptive and comparative statistical analyses. A total of 210 people with bipolar disorder/mania as well as 112 people with unipolar depression participated in the survey. Both groups specified general information search as their most relevant information need and decisions on treatment setting (inpatient or outpatient) as well as decisions on pharmacological treatment as the most difficult treatment decisions. For participants with unipolar depression, decisions concerning psychotherapeutic treatment were also especially difficult. Most participants of both groups preferred shared decisions but experienced less shared decisions than desired. Our results show the importance of information for patients with affective disorders, with a focus on pharmacological treatment and on the different treatment settings, and highlight patients' requirements to be involved in the decision-making process. Since our sample reported a chronic course of disease, we do not know if our results are applicable for newly diagnosed patients. Further studies should consider how the reported needs could be addressed in health care practice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Computer Science 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 14 26%