↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Priority interventions to improve the management of chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: a participatory research of the ACCORD program

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Priority interventions to improve the management of chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: a participatory research of the ACCORD program
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, April 2015
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s78177
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lyne Lalonde, Manon Choinière, Elisabeth Martin, Lise Lévesque, Eveline Hudon, Danielle Bélanger, Sylvie Perreault, Anaïs Lacasse, Marie-Claude Laliberté

Abstract

There is evidence that the management of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) in primary care is far from being optimal. A 1-day workshop was held to explore the perceptions of key actors regarding the challenges and priority interventions to improve CNCP management in primary care. Using the Chronic Care Model as a conceptual framework, physicians (n=6), pharmacists (n=6), nurses (n=6), physiotherapists (n=6), psychologists (n=6), pain specialists (n=6), patients (n=3), family members (n=3), decision makers and managers (n=4), and pain researchers (n=7) took part in seven focus groups and five nominal groups. Challenges identified in focus group discussions were related to five dimensions: knowledge gap, "work in silos", lack of awareness that CNCP represents an important clinical problem, difficulties in access to health professionals and services, and patient empowerment needs. Based on the nominal group discussions, the following priority interventions were identified: interdisciplinary continuing education, interdisciplinary treatment approach, regional expert leadership, creation and definition of care paths, and patient education programs. Barriers to optimal management of CNCP in primary care are numerous. Improving its management cannot be envisioned without considering multifaceted interventions targeting several dimensions of the Chronic Care Model and focusing on both clinicians and patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 118 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Researcher 13 11%
Other 8 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 29 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 27 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 19%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 35 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2016.
All research outputs
#3,026,382
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#339
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,574
of 279,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.