↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cervical cancer screening and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in female sex workers using “screen and treat” approach

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Cervical cancer screening and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in female sex workers using “screen and treat” approach
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, May 2015
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s80624
Pubmed ID
Authors

Smita Joshi, Vinay Kulkarni, Trupti Darak, Uma Mahajan, Yogesh Srivastava, Sanjay Gupta, Sumitra Krishnan, Mahesh Mandolkar, Alok Chandra Bharti

Abstract

Female sex workers (FSWs) are at an increased risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as well as human papillomavirus (HPV) infections and thus have an increased risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical cancer. We evaluated the feasibility of "screen and treat approach" for cervical cancer prevention and the performance of different screening tests among FSWs. Women were screened using cytology, VIA (visual inspection with acetic acid), and VILI (visual inspection with Lugol's iodine) and underwent colposcopy, biopsy, and immediate treatment using cold coagulation, if indicated, at the same visit. We screened 300 FSWs of whom 200 (66.67%) were HIV uninfected and 100 (33.34%) were HIV infected. The overall prevalence of CIN 2-3 lesions was 4.7%. But all women with CIN 2-3 lesions were HIV infected, and thus the prevalence of CIN 2-3 lesions in HIV-infected FSWs was 14/100 (14%, 95% confidence interval: 7.2-20.8). All of them screened positive by all three screening tests. Cold coagulation was well tolerated, with no appreciable side effects. Cervical cancer prevention by "screen and treat" approach using VIA, followed by ablative treatment, in this high-risk group of women is feasible and can be implemented through various targeted intervention programs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 22%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Other 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 35%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,569,923
of 23,671,454 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#264
of 812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,693
of 265,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,671,454 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.