↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The Danish National Prescription Registry in studies of a biological pharmaceutical: palivizumab – validation against two external data sources

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
The Danish National Prescription Registry in studies of a biological pharmaceutical: palivizumab – validation against two external data sources
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, May 2015
DOI 10.2147/clep.s73355
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann Haerskjold, Lonny Henriksen, Susanne Way, Mikkel Malham, Jesper Hallas, Lars Pedersen, Lone Graff Stensballe

Abstract

National prescription databases are important tools in pharmacoepidemiological studies investigating potential long-term adverse events after drug use. Palivizumab is a biological pharmaceutical used as passive prophylaxis against severe infection with respiratory syncytial virus in high-risk children. To assess the registration of palivizumab in the Danish National Prescription Registry (DNPR) and to examine if palivizumab reimbursement data obtained from the Danish Health and Medicines Authority could serve as a supplement to data from the DNPR. Registration of palivizumab exposure in the DNPR between 1999 and 2010 was compared to two external data sources: registration of palivizumab exposure in medical records, and palivizumab reimbursement data. During the study period, 182 children with palivizumab exposure were registered in the DNPR. A total of 207 children were registered for palivizumab reimbursement. The sensitivity of palivizumab registration in the DNPR was 26% (20%-34%), and the specificity of no palivizumab registration in the DNPR was 97% (94%-99%), with data from the medical record as the reference. Palivizumab registration sensitivity in reimbursement data was 29% (22%-36%), and the specificity of no palivizumab registration in the DNPR was 97% (94%-99%), with data from the medical record as the reference. Exposure to palivizumab was underestimated in the DNPR. Reimbursement data are a readily accessible data supplement, which only slightly increased the sensitivity of palivizumab registration in the DNPR. Our findings underline the need to improve DNPR information concerning drugs administered in hospitals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 5%
Portugal 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 18%
Other 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#639
of 793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,515
of 278,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.