↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

White coat hypertension: improving the patient–health care practitioner relationship

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 789)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
White coat hypertension: improving the patient–health care practitioner relationship
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, May 2015
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s61192
Pubmed ID
Authors

Briana Cobos, Kelly Haskard-Zolnierek, Krista Howard

Abstract

White coat hypertension is characterized by the variability of a patient's blood pressure measurements between the physician's office and the patient's home environment. A patient with white coat hypertension has high blood pressure levels in the physician's office and normal blood pressure levels in their typical environment. This condition is likely caused by the patient's anxiety within the physician's office and in the presence of the physician. Research has shown that improving the relationship between a patient and their health care provider can decrease the patient's anxiety, with the implication of decreasing the patient's likelihood of demonstrating white coat hypertension. This review provides an overview of the previous literature regarding white coat hypertension, its prevalence, and the consequences for those who develop persistent hypertension. Furthermore, this review discusses the implications of improving patient and health care provider interactions through effective communication, empathy, and trust, as well as the implications for future research studies in improving the patient and health care provider's relationship.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 57 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Psychology 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 61 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#805,670
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#31
of 789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,417
of 279,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.